If there is any case that epitomizes the corruption and incompetence of Loudoun Child Protective Services, it has to be the Brad R. Minor Case. Keep in mind at the time, Laurie Warhol was the CPS Manager and Sandra Glenney the Assistant County Attorney.

UPDATE: More allegations come to light in child sex abuse case | News | loudountimes.com

Accusations were made against Minor and a case opened with Child Protective Services. Incredibly, CPS closed the case as unfounded; only to have DNA testing confirm the accusation. CPS closed their case before the DNA tests were returned. They could not have been any more wrong.

Childcare Worker Sentenced to Ten Years | Leesburg, VA Patch

This more than demonstrates that the agency does not have the ability to conduct a reasonable investigation. Laurie Warhol and Sandra Glenney were in charge when this happened, putting children in danger.  They only pursue cases that they are interested in, the others they dismiss.

Loudoun CPS is not a serious organization or one that should be taken seriously.

As said many times before, in the absence of any physical evidence. Sandra Glenny will then rely heavily on her chosen therapists. Her chosen therapists are inclined to think one way, that way is that abuse occurred. The below article concerning the Little Rascals Case highlights the issue.

http://loudouncps.org/mdocs-posts/thoughts-from-the-little-rascals-case/

On page 5 of the article, the author, Dr. Moisy Shopper, makes the following statement.

The name children were sent to predominately four therapists. The therapists were not only overzealous and in certain ways, inadequately trained, but proceeded in an unethical fashion with the children. Reporting frequently to the district attorney’s office , they provided more names of children and adults and more specific allegations of abuse. These were not spontaneous name and allegations, but data specifically and persistently introduced by the therapists. The personal and familial issues were that the children brought into the so-called therapy were ignored. When the therapists addressed these issues it was done in a most simplistic and unhelpful way. The overall effect of the therapy was to instill fear in child and parent. From my review of the therapists notes of the 17 children, it was clear to me that the therapists were not involved in treating these children psychotherapeutically, but were in effect, agents of the prosecution in preparing children to testify falsely with credibility. Significantly, those parents who took their children to therapists in other communities or avoided these four therapists had no allegations of sexual abuse and their children were symptom free. In contrast, the children who provided stories of sexual abuse became increasingly symptomatic over time and their behavior become more disturbed.

This segment of the document fits Sandra Glenney perfectly, her therapists work for her. They have no interest in the well being of the child. They are looking for abuse. Please note that statement that the parents who took their children to other therapists did not have the same diagnosis.

Among the inner circle of the Loudoun County legal realm, especially within the governmental positions there is an unspoken code that you tolerate incompetence.  Essentially Sandra Glenney and Judge Horne worked for the same boss, the government of Virginia.  Their salaries are paid by the taxpayers.

In theory Judge Horne should be unbiased and autonomous but he was anything other than. The question is, was he coward or incompetent. Let’s take a look at what happened when Sandra Glenney suggested that Dr. Joyanna Silberg become involved an alleged sexual abuse case.

Continue reading →

As mention several times before, Sandra Glenney chooses therapists that have a less than stellar reputation and questionable tactics.  Primary among them is Dr. Joyana Silberg, who has questionable tactics. She has been identified by the watchdog group Grey Faction, as a therapist to be wary of.  Either Sandra Glenney is so desperate to win cases that she is wiling employ therapists of dubious reputations or she believes what they are selling. neither one is a good scenario.

Below are example of cases where her testimony was disallowed due to its biased nature.

Holt v Holt (No. 1064, September Term, 2017), 2018
Dr. Silberg’s testimony was deemed to be biased and suffer from “tremendous analytical gaps,” and was deemed by the court to lack credibility.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3430551134760014963&hl=en&as_sdt=6,47

Marks v Schenk (No. 807, September Term, 2016), 2018
This case was a custody dispute over a child that was alleged by his mother to have been sexually abused by his father. The mother showed many signs of erratic and unstable behavior during the case, and Silberg would be her “staunchest advocate” throughout. The judge in this case had numerous complaints about Dr. Silberg’s own behavior, stating that she “compromised her professional boundaries,” lied to the court, and went beyond her authority in discontinuing court-ordered visitation by the father.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?scidkt=10092161310836718585&as_sdt=2&hl=en

This one podcast will educate and inform of how people like Sandra Glenney and her therapists think.  It covers the false accusations of the 80’s and 90’s.

Sandra Glenney,  the woeful Assistant  County Attorney in Loudoun County, is an example of incompetence. The recent revelation of the Maret School Investigation reveals this.  She was notified .  Footnote 37 of the report says it all, Glenney took no action. She is the alleged defender of children, the protector of families. What non-sense she is a failed attorney who has to work on a Government Job.

“In 2017, the School reported to DC CFSA that Legg was working at a
high school in Loudoun County, Virginia, but was told that Loudoun County Child Protective Services would not open an investigation regarding abuse that occurred outside of Loudoun County. The School then reported to the Loudoun County Attorney’s Office and asked that they contact the high school where Legg was teaching, to notify them directly of the reports received”

” An Assistant County Attorney for Loudoun County had suggested to the School that the victims themselves be encouraged to contact Rock Ridge High School, where Legg was teaching.”

The same goes for Laurie Warhol,  she also failed to act. Again Laurie Warhol. the alleged protector of children, failed to act. She failed to simply pick up the phone and call the local school in Loudoun. They are both abysmal.