Category Archives: Uncategorized

Loudoun CPS – The typical poorly trained social worker

ben_smith

The infamous Benjamin Smith exemplifies the type of social worker that Dr. Richard Gardner describes in the following article.   The point cannot be stressed enough that the social workers for Loudoun County are poorly trained. Dr. Gardner is correct in using the tern abuse validators instead of investigators, from the article.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – Did Dr. Mary Lindahl intend to decieve the Court and CPS

lindahlglenney

 

There is financial gain for a therapist in testifying for Loudoun Child Protective Services. The going rate is approximately $150 per hour for an extended period of time.  It is difficult for a therapist to do the right thing if their business models depends on a constant flow of referrals from Loudoun CPS and Sandra Glenney. Why Dr. Mary Lindahl withheld a child’s retractions from the Court and CPS is an interesting question. She more than likely knew that Sandra Glenney did not want to be distracted by facts.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – Sandra Glenney continues the Ritual Abuse Hoax

The below article by Debbie Nathan perfectly describes the approach to Child Abuse investigations by Sandra Glenney and Loudoun CPS. Glenney’s approach is don’t take no for an answer from a child.

THE RITUAL SEX ABUSE HOAX

[From The Village Voice, January 12, 1990. Reprinted in Women and Other Aliens: Essays from the U.S.-Mexico Border, El Paso: Cinco Puntos Press, 1991. Copyright 1990 by Debbie Nathan. Reposted here with explicit permission of Debbie Nathan. Direct reposting requests to mc@ncrj.org.]

THE RITUAL SEX ABUSE HOAX

by Debbie Nathan

After the First McMartin Trial

The eight kids sitting in Geraldo Rivera’s New York studio after the first McMartin trial ended could have stepped out of a candy bar commercial on Saturday morning TV. They gleamed with the healthy tans, shopping-mall clothes, and moussed sun-bleached hair of the southern California suburbs; their parents looked equally affluent. But these families were far from cheerful. “We were molested,” a strapping blond teenager told the audience solemnly, “and that’s an honest-to-God fact.” When some of the children – most of them by now adolescents – described suffering flashbacks and night terrors, their mothers quietly dabbed at tears. Other parents seemed angry and driven. “The parents and children standing up here will not stop,” said Marymae Cioffi, who since the beginning of the case had been organizing to convince the public and the courts that bizarre sex abuse claims at places like the McMartin preschool should be believed

 

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – Dr. Mary Lindahl

lindahl

It is important to subpoena all notes from Child Protective Services and the psychologist who testifies for CPS. Dr. Lindahl provides and excellent example of why all notes should be subpoenaed and the very distorted thinking of CPS psychologists.

As stated before, as it is a very true statement. The mechanism that enables the Loudoun County Child Protective Services machine to grind away at families are the psychologists that will testify for CPS and  Sandra Glenney.   In addition , the therapists that perform reunification therapy for CPS or treat a child has one goal, that is to terminate the relationship between the child and the parent.  Dr. Lindahl in recent case performed the role of a CPS psychologists to a tee. She followed the wished and instructions of Sandra Glenney perfectly.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – The Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)

GardnerPAS

A parent who plants the seed of false allegations of abuse is also planting the seeds of the Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS).  The term Parental Alienation Syndrome was developed by Dr. Richard Gardner to describe the circumstances that he observed in high conflict divorce cases. PAS is completely and totally rejected by Loudoun County Child Protective Services, their training completely and totally dismisses it. It is generally accepted by mental health professionals.

 

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:
Link

glenneywarhol2macfarlane2

 

Loudoun CPS is the pro-abuse crowd, they are going to believe any claims of sexual abuse.  It is worth noting that the hierarchy within Loudoun CPS is essentially all females.  This  includes Sandra Glenney of the Loudoun County Attorney’s office, Ellen Grunewald (Director of Loudoun CPS ) and Laurie Warhol of Loudoun CPS.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – The “alleged offender” interview

ben_smith

The attached document , illustrates the mentality of Loudoun County Child Protective Services.  The document  provides guidance on how to conduct an interview with the “alleged offender”. As you can read, the purpose of the interview is to obtain a confession. The assumption is that abuse has already occurred. It is vitally important that you notify your attorney of all threats made to you by the detective and the social worker.  It also critical that you get all tapes of your interview. Your interview will be taped whether it be audio or visual, it will be taped.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – Sandra Glenney is even more bizrarre

Sandra Glenney and her willingness to use therapists from the ISSTD is even more disturbing when you fully grasp the beliefs of that organization. A current member and former president , Dr. Colin Ross is a controversial figure to say the least. Dr. Colin testified in the case of Billy Joe Harris for the defense, Dr. Ross attempted to testify that Mr. Harris committed a rape while under a different personality as he allegedly  suffered from Multiple Personality Disorder. The cross examination of Dr. Ross begins n page 57 of the following transcript. 

It is  a good transcript to study to gt a feel of how to question a hired gun mental health professional.

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – Effects of repeated questioning

frontline

From the excellent documentary Innocence Lost , the below article discusses the issue with repeated questioning of a child.  I recommend paying close attention to the mother’s questioning of the child prior to the child speaking with a therapist. It illustrates how children change their mind after repeated questioning.  A child will attempt to satisfy the adults when questioned repeatedly.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/innocence/readings/repeated.html

In the Little Rascals case, there are no electronic recordings of the initial interviews with the children. On the basis of the available evidence, it seems that many children denied during initial interviews that anything sexual had happened. Some of the children talked about hitting or spanking in the day-care center, but they mainly made these claims about other children (in the next chapter, on stereotype induction, we will address these reports of hitting in more detail). The only child who made any statements that may have been indicative of abuse was Carl P. But this was not the first time that Carl had been questioned. His mother had been questioning him since at least the beginning of December; initially, he had denied any wrongdoing at the center, although he later said that Mr. Bob had played “doctor” with some of his friends, but not with him

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Loudoun CPS – New York Times Article Concerning Suggestibility part 2

 

Studies Reveal Suggestibility Of Very Young as Witnesses

(Page 2 of 2)

When the question was posed in a leading fashion, using the child’s own word for genitals, 70 percent of children who had received no genital exam indicated incorrectly that the doctor had touched their genitals. Skewing of Memories

The children are not being intentionally misleading, Dr. Ceci said, but are simply very poor at recalling and explaining what happened.

That uncertainty may partly explain why adults who have a fixed idea of what has happened to a child can often get the child to agree. In another study by Dr. Ceci and his colleagues, interviewers were misled about details of a game played by preschool children. The interviewers eventually got a third of 3- and 4-year-olds and 18 percent of 5- and 6-year-olds to corroborate at least one of the things the interviewers mistakenly believed had happened.

The very stressfulness of an event like sexual abuse can make children give false reports. “If the original situation was very stressful, it can narrow a child’s perception so that later memories won’t be as accurate,” said Dr. Douglas Peters, a psychologist at the University of North Dakota, whose research shows that distressing situations increase the mistakes children make in recounting them.

Earlier studies of young children’s suggestibility led to the conclusion that they could be swayed only about minor details, not the main facts of what had happened to them. But his review of the recent data has led Dr. Ceci to a different conclusion. Changes Recommended

“We find nothing in a child’s memory is impervious to being tainted by an adult’s repeated suggestions,” Dr. Ceci said. “We find from reading transcripts of investigations that in many sex-abuse cases the adults not only pursued a hypothesis about what happened, but were sometimes even coercive in getting children to agree. They went far beyond anything we could do ethically as researchers.”

Dr. Ceci and Dr. Bruck, in an article to appear in the fall in a report by the Society for Research in Child Development, recommend that people investigating possible cases of child abuse change their procedures, for example, by avoiding repeated suggestions or putting much emphasis on evidence from anatomical dolls.

“The bottom line is that even very young children can give accurate accounts if the interviewers haven’t usurped their memory through repeated suggestive or leading questions,” Dr. Ceci said. “Interviewers ought to safeguard against this by testing at least one alternative plausible hypothesis about what happened. If they fail to do this, they’re in danger of confirming their own bias by unduly influencing and distorting the child’s memory.”

But other researchers feel that the cautions are misplaced. “Research that focuses only on children’s suggestibility gives only part of the picture,” Dr. Goodman said. Sexually abused children are often “very reluctant to admit it,” she said, adding, “If your recommendations are based only on avoiding suggesting things to children, it runs the risk of tipping the balance too far, so you get many fewer disclosures of abuse.” A Sense of Urgency

Citing a study in which 43 percent of young children diagnosed with sexually transmitted diseases denied having been sexually abused, Dr. Lucy Berliner, director of research at the Harborview Sexual Assault Center in Seattle, said: “Sometimes your sense of urgency with kids you know are victims makes you feel you need to do whatever is necessary to help the child tell what happened. If that leads to a coercive approach, it’s motivated by concern.”

Dr. Berliner added: “If you’ve ever tried to interview a 4-year-old about a sensitive topic, you’ll see it’s rarely productive just to ask, ‘Is there anything you want to tell me about?’ That’s what police or caseworkers face. They argue that we’ll never find out anything if we can’t ask specific questions.”

Photo: A study by Dr. Stephen Ceci, a psychologist at Cornell University, found that repetition may lead some young children to concoct stories. He is shown in front of a two-way mirror where he interviews patients. (Peter Freed) (pg. A23) Chart: “How the Questions Become the Answers” Excerpts from interviews of a 4-year-old boy to whom the interviewer said each week for 11 consecutive weeks: “You went to the hospital because you finger got caught in a mousetrap. Did this ever happen to you?” FIRST INTERVIEW: “No. I’ve never been to the hospital.” SECOND INTERVIEW: “Yes. I cried.” THIRD INTERVIEW: “Yes. My mom went to the hospital with me.” FOURTH INTERVIEW: “Yes, I remember. It felt like a cut.” FIFTH INTERVIEW: “Yes.” [ Pointing to index finger. ] ELEVENTH INTERVIEW: “Uh huh. . . . My daddy, mommy and my brother [ took me to the hospital ] in our van . . . The hospital gave me . . . a little bandage, and it was right here.” [ Pointing to index finger. ] The interviewer then asked, “How did it happen?” “I was looking and then I didn’t see what I was doing and it [ finger ] got in there somehow . . . The mousetrap was in our house because there’s a mouse in our house . . . The mousetrap is down in the basement, next to the firewood. . . . I was playing a game called ‘Operation’ and then I went downstairs and said to Dad, ‘I want to eat lunch,’ and then it got stuck in the mousetrap. . . . My daddy was down in the basement collecting firewood. . . . [ My brother ] pushed me [ into the mousetrap. ] . . . It happened yesterday. The mouse was in my house yesterday. I caught my finger in it yesterday. I went to the hospital yesterday.” (Source: Dr. Stephen J. Ceci/Cornell) (pg. A23)

 

 

Please follow and like us: