Loudoun CPS – The child masturbation argument

glenneylindahl

Sandra Glenney loves to talk about child masturbation in the Courtroom. Dr. Mary Lindahl loves to talk about child masturbation in the Courtroom.   Glenney will file affidavits that the child is masturbating. Dr. Lindahl will testify in Court that the child is masturbating.  The accusing parent  will testify that the child is masturbating.  This is a very frequently used trick by Glenney, all she ever does in the Courtroom are cheap parlor tricks.

Ironically, no one else we come in the Courtroom to testify that your child is masturbating. This will include teachers, pediatricians etc … The answer is simple , it is because your child is not masturbating excessively. It is  in Glenney’s twisted distorted mind.  When Glenney and Lindahl make this argument you combat it with research.

First, the field of psychology and the quacks that are in it had and hold very bizarre beliefs about child masturbation.   Please see article below. It list those bizarre beliefs.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/06/how-to-address-the-masturbating-child/277026/

Your attorney needs to question Lindahl about the previously held beliefs of the very unscientific field of psychology. Then he or she needs to follow up by asking Lindhal what her professional opinion is concerning child masturbation, specifically when does it become a problem.

Then your attorney needs to ask Lindahl  if it is a problem if the parent is overly concerned with the child masturbating. Such as consistently reprimanding the child for it. In other words, you counter their junk science with real science. With each question, your attorney should be educating the judge and enlightening the judge about the research.

https://www.summitmedicalgroup.com/library/pediatric_health/pa-hhgbeh_masturbation/

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *